PLOS ONE - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Impact factor (2013) 3.534 Indexing ISSN LCCN OCLC no. Links PLOS ONE (originally PLoS ONE) is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. It covers primary research from any discipline ...
PLOS ONE - Official Site PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. Reports of well-performed scientific studies from all disciplines freely ...
PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline | The Scholarly Kitchen Are authors leaving PLOS ONE for higher performing journals? ... I’m not sure I’ll be able to find evidence for any cause, Impact Factor or anything else, based on the ALM reports alone. And I’m not sure you could from just looking at (a possibly skewed s
在PLOS ONE上投稿的過程 (郵件版) - 論文投稿 - 小木蟲 - 學術 科研 第一站 剛剛在PLOS ONE 上發了我讀碩期間的第一篇SCI文章,心裏挺開心的。一個蟲友曾問我在這上面發文章的流程,希朢我能出個技術貼~慚愧的是小弟我記憶力不是太好,投稿的流程忘了差不多了。其實我也是第一次投,就按雜誌給的頁面一步步來的,沒有遇到 ...
Author Frequently Asked Questions - PLOS ONE - EveryONE Overview This FAQ addresses some of our authors’ most common problems or questions. We ask that you review our basic Editorial Criteria and examine our Editorial Policies page for information about the general policies that apply to any PLOS submission pr
Publication Fees | PLOS - PLOS | Public Library Of Science To provide Open Access, PLOS uses a business model to offset expenses – including those of peer review management, journal production and online hosting and archiving – by charging a publication fee to the authors, institutions or funders for each article
Journals | PLOS PLOS publishes a suite of influential journals from all areas of science and medicine that contain rigorously reported, peer reviewed Open Access research articles. The journals vary in their criteria for publication and, with the exception of PLOS ONE, a
EveryONE Community Blog - PLOS Blogs Network As we take a look back at research articles published so far in PLOS ONE in 2014, we realize we have no shortage of images to terrify our readers, or at least sufficiently creep them out long enough to last through Halloween and possibly the whole weekend
Why I published in PLoS ONE. And why I probably won’t again for awhile. | Early Career Ecologists By Andrew Tredennick One morning as I was working on revisions for a paper I had submitted to PLoS ONE, this popped up on my Twitter feed, http://twitter.com/eperlste/status/293490596360880128 and I immediately felt defeated. Had I chosen poorly when ...
Why I resigned as PLOS ONE academic editor | opiniomics Bob O'H September 9, 2013 at 3:47 pm That’s certainly not good, but I can see all of the pieces of it happening. Here’s my sympathetic-to-PLOS thoughts: 1. 6 weeks to get from submission to a single, short, poor review is not acceptable for what PLOS are